Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges

FMR 44 State reluctance to use alternatives to detention

Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)
Audio Embed
States continue to show a marked reluctance to implement alternatives to immigration detention. The reason for this may well be because such alternatives ignore the disciplinary function of detention by which states coerce people into cooperation.

More in this series

View Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)

FMR 44 No longer a child: from the UK to Afghanistan

Young Afghans forced to return to Kabul having spent formative years in the UK encounter particular risks and lack any tailored support on their return.
Previous
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)

FMR 44 Questions over alternatives to detention programmes

Alternative to detention programmes may be less restrictive and less expensive than formal detention but they may still have drawbacks. The provision of competent legal advice appears to be key to low rates of absconding.
Next
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)
People
Clément de Senarclens
Keywords
detention alternatives
state reluctance
fmr
detention and deportation
forced migration review
Department: Oxford Department of International Development
Date Added: 04/10/2013
Duration: 00:08:35

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Audio Audio RSS Feed

Download

Download Audio

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford