Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges

FMR 44 Questions over alternatives to detention programmes

Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)
Audio Embed
Alternative to detention programmes may be less restrictive and less expensive than formal detention but they may still have drawbacks. The provision of competent legal advice appears to be key to low rates of absconding.

More in this series

View Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)

FMR 44 State reluctance to use alternatives to detention

States continue to show a marked reluctance to implement alternatives to immigration detention. The reason for this may well be because such alternatives ignore the disciplinary function of detention by which states coerce people into cooperation.
Previous
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)

FMR 44 Flawed assessment process leads to under-use of alternatives in Sweden

Sweden is often held up as following 'best practice' in legislation with regard to detention and alternatives to detention but research by the Swedish Red Cross highlights a number of flaws.
Next
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/

Episode Information

Series
Detention and deportation (Forced Migration Review 44)
People
Stephanie J Silverman
Keywords
deportation
alternatives
fmr
detention and deportation
forced migration review
Department: Oxford Department of International Development
Date Added: 04/10/2013
Duration: 00:03:41

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Audio Audio RSS Feed

Download

Download Audio

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford